Some topics of discussion are very itchy. In short, do not pretend to talk badge, codicum or uncial writing or Polish poets who committed suicide at twenty or silent films or coats or experimental groups of the province or comics or metaphysical evolutionism or improvised or epistemology. But, at least, not if you had the proper encyclopedic luggage to carry out such discussions - and it is not mandatory, for heaven's sake! - We are talking about soccer or pussy or film trash, please. My
idiosyncrasy against the philosophers, for example, often leads me to avoid questions on the subject, at least in certain terms. No, they will not find the truth and even though they seek in ogni modo di pararsi il culo con sub-teorie che facciano da scudo a possibili repliche o con tesi-non tesi che lasciano l’ambiguo in bocca, il loro cristallino, monumentale ma fatiscente edificio razionalistico è sempre, almeno da un piccolo spiraglio, attaccabile. E non c’è niente di peggio di chi si improvvisa filosofo! Quantomeno i filosofi famosi lo facevano con stile.
La morale poi. Oh, la morale spicciola, che gustoso tema di discussione, quasi divertente. Belli soprattutto concetti quali “coerenza” e “ipocrisia”, che si contendono il secondo posto subito dietro l’ormai mitico “mettersi in discussione” e appena avanti a “dovere civico”. Tanto valeva tenersi le tables of the law, at least sound good ear.
But over all, the timeless topos of the 'eh, but you know, today ... "I'll explain how it works. Take the sentence quoted above in quotes and add immediately after any aspect of life, culture, politics, society, and denigrating remembering back (I shake your hand for the rhetorical skills) and a bit nostalgic for the glory 'fascists the past. There are no groups more noise than once. Young people today do not read. Oh, yes, but Berlinguer who was a true politician. Of course now, if not from around ... Once the skills were worth. The children now take drugs and then go to the disco and then die in a car. Some examples from the repertoire, nothing more. It is worth emphasizing that this is topos real and not cliché: the dawn of time talking about "golden age" of "pomp of ancient Rome", of "Spring of humanity" of "classical gold standard" and so on running. Eh, it's true, once they knew to give the most beautiful names in this thing, but now ...!
And what is the plan diachronic, that is also on the diatopically. Italy compared to any other corner of the world stressing sucks like the first, I think sport is becoming a recognized and regulated.
short, if you want to talk about shit, do it like me, open up a blog, so no one will be forced to listen to you and will only do so if they wish. Or talk about tits, ass, Italian Cup and Lino Banfi. I repeat that at least they are still large issues, and exterminated about which everyone can have their say.
Yes, if you're wondering why there is a grammar as a picture of post ... Boh, is a bit 'I wanted to use it, but the neurons for intelligent conversation I left them all for the exams that I give, then use it for bullshit. Who can forgive me.
idiosyncrasy against the philosophers, for example, often leads me to avoid questions on the subject, at least in certain terms. No, they will not find the truth and even though they seek in ogni modo di pararsi il culo con sub-teorie che facciano da scudo a possibili repliche o con tesi-non tesi che lasciano l’ambiguo in bocca, il loro cristallino, monumentale ma fatiscente edificio razionalistico è sempre, almeno da un piccolo spiraglio, attaccabile. E non c’è niente di peggio di chi si improvvisa filosofo! Quantomeno i filosofi famosi lo facevano con stile.
La morale poi. Oh, la morale spicciola, che gustoso tema di discussione, quasi divertente. Belli soprattutto concetti quali “coerenza” e “ipocrisia”, che si contendono il secondo posto subito dietro l’ormai mitico “mettersi in discussione” e appena avanti a “dovere civico”. Tanto valeva tenersi le tables of the law, at least sound good ear.
But over all, the timeless topos of the 'eh, but you know, today ... "I'll explain how it works. Take the sentence quoted above in quotes and add immediately after any aspect of life, culture, politics, society, and denigrating remembering back (I shake your hand for the rhetorical skills) and a bit nostalgic for the glory 'fascists the past. There are no groups more noise than once. Young people today do not read. Oh, yes, but Berlinguer who was a true politician. Of course now, if not from around ... Once the skills were worth. The children now take drugs and then go to the disco and then die in a car. Some examples from the repertoire, nothing more. It is worth emphasizing that this is topos real and not cliché: the dawn of time talking about "golden age" of "pomp of ancient Rome", of "Spring of humanity" of "classical gold standard" and so on running. Eh, it's true, once they knew to give the most beautiful names in this thing, but now ...!
And what is the plan diachronic, that is also on the diatopically. Italy compared to any other corner of the world stressing sucks like the first, I think sport is becoming a recognized and regulated.
short, if you want to talk about shit, do it like me, open up a blog, so no one will be forced to listen to you and will only do so if they wish. Or talk about tits, ass, Italian Cup and Lino Banfi. I repeat that at least they are still large issues, and exterminated about which everyone can have their say.
Yes, if you're wondering why there is a grammar as a picture of post ... Boh, is a bit 'I wanted to use it, but the neurons for intelligent conversation I left them all for the exams that I give, then use it for bullshit. Who can forgive me.
0 comments:
Post a Comment